Sumber ilustrasi: Magnific
18 Mei 2026 10.37 WIB – Akar
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Desanomia [18.05.2026] When a wood sculptor works, something miraculous takes place. What is called miraculous here is the process through which, from a large block of wood, there emerges the form of a human being, an animal, a plant, or certain objects. If an ordinary question is asked — how does the sculptor work in such a way that he is able to see what others cannot see? — it appears as though the sculptor is drawing those forms out from within the wood itself. That is the miracle.
Such an explanation is, of course, easy enough to accept. What may seem rather strange is if the same explanation is given to an ordinary cook in a household kitchen — not a chef at a culinary festival. Few of us are prepared to recognise that miracles occur every day in domestic kitchens. What is miraculous about them? The existence of dishes with distinctive flavours, appetising forms, and remarkable taste. Why miraculous? Because the dishes are made from ingredients purchased at the market. When the cook buys the raw ingredients, nobody observing the process imagines that, a short while later, those materials will have become an extraordinary and beautiful formation.
Work that produces miracles — this is what we understand as karya. In this sense, a karya is fundamentally the manifestation of the human being into a particular form, such that something which previously existed only as possibility becomes present, real, and capable of being experienced. A karya may take the form of an object, a piece of writing, a building, a song, a theory, an action, a system, or even a particular way of life. In this understanding, a karya is not merely the result of labour, but a mode of human presence in the world. Through karya, human beings do not only make things; they simultaneously reveal how they understand reality, necessity, beauty, fear, hope, and the direction of their own lives.
Within this definition lies an important meaning: every karya contains a relationship between human beings and the world they confront. No karya emerges without a particular way of seeing life. Even the simplest tools — a hoe, a house, a boat, clothing, or a footpath — embody a certain way in which humans read nature, organise life, and sustain their existence. A karya, therefore, is not just a dead object, but the trace of a way of living.
A bird builds a nest, bees construct honeycombs, ants form colonies. Yet human karya differ because human beings do not act solely on the basis of biological impulse. Humans are capable of imagining something before it exists. A house, for example, exists twice: first in imagination, and then in reality. It is within this capacity for imagination that a karya becomes more than mere production; it becomes the embodiment of consciousness.
For that reason, every karya contains the inner world of the human being. A poem is not only made of words, but also of the way someone experiences loss, love, death, or hope. A city is not built only by concrete and roads, but also a vision of order, power, commerce, security, and human relationships. Even an economic system or a form of state may be regarded as a karya, for all are arrangements of the world based upon particular understandings of humanity and life.
Karya are never neutral. Hidden within every karya are assumptions concerning what is considered important. When a society builds open houses, it reflects a different way of life from a society that builds high fences and enclosed spaces. When an age produces vast cathedrals, pyramids, shopping centres, or global digital networks, what becomes visible is not only technical capability, but the direction of that civilisation’s attention.
Karya also reveal that human beings are creatures who are never complete. Animals generally live within relatively fixed patterns, but humans continuously alter their ways of life through karya. Humans create tools, and then those tools alter human life in return. Humans invent writing, and writing changes the way humans remember and think. Humans create machines, and machines transform rhythms of labour, cities, social relations, and even humanity’s understanding of time itself. In this sense, a karya is not only produced by humans; it subsequently reshapes humans in return.
From this perspective, human history may fundamentally be read as the history of karya. Historical change is not simply the passing of years, but the transformation of the forms of karya that sustain life. The Stone Age, the agricultural age, the industrial age, and the digital age all signify changing relationships between humans, nature, labour, knowledge, and one another. To understand a society, therefore, one may look at its karya: what it builds, what it produces, what it destroys, and what it considers worthy of inheritance.
Yet karya also reveal human limitation. Not everything imagined can be realised. Some karya fail, collapse, are forgotten, or even become threats to their creators. Technologies intended to ease life may generate alienation. Systems intended to create order may turn into instruments of domination. From this it becomes clear that every karya carries a double possibility: it may liberate while simultaneously restricting, expand while simultaneously confining.
Moreover, karya reveal that human beings do not live alone. No great karya is ever entirely born from an isolated individual detached from the world. The language used by a writer comes from society. The knowledge employed by a scientist is inherited from previous generations. Music, architecture, and technology develop through long collective traditions of shared experience. Even the most personal karya still contains a collective dimension within it. A karya therefore always exists between individuality and the shared history of humankind.
We may understood a karya as a way through which human beings leave traces of their existence. Humans are aware that they themselves are finite, while life continues beyond them. Through karya, humans seem to attempt to transcend that limitation: to build something that remains even after they themselves are gone. A piece of writing, a song, a building, or an idea becomes a continuation of human presence beyond biological life.
Yet it is precisely here that the deepest question emerges: are karya truly created in order to change the world, or in order to allow human beings to feel that they genuinely exist within it? For when humans create, what is taking place is not just the production of something, but also the process of discovering themselves. Through karya, humans attempt to answer who they are, how they ought to live, what they consider meaningful, and what kind of world they wish to bring into being.
What do you think? (njd)
Note: This article was made as part of a dedicated effort to bring everyday life around us to our minds.
